9999

Man YOU are the one twisting things. You claim absurtidies like "1st Corinthians even criticizes baptism for the dead". If you read that scripture CORRECTLY you would know he was giving a hypothetical question. He was asking "why are people baptized for the dead if the dead don't even rise?" But of COURSE he is a follower of God therefore he BELIEVED in the resurrection! He was saying that the dead ARE baptized and they DO rise from the dead. And your mention of people coming from the graves? People who weren't given an opportunity to experience the Savior's Gospel and followed the Law of Moses righteously are allowed to be resurrected. They didn't NEED to be taught the gospel of Christ because they didn't have the opportunity! Moses' Law was a temporary thing, but people still needed to be devote followers! Sheesh. Also about the "sexual relation with Mary" thing. Give me reference..give me the quote that says Brigham young believed in that! Church doctrine states today that there isn't much known about it, but that Mary was a virgin before and AFTER she conceived Jesus. And when the General Authorities say "a natural and normal event" they don't mean sexually natural, they even say they mean according to the LAWS of nature, that God obeyed the law of nature and didn't break them even thought Mary was a virgin after her concieving. This shows that there are ways to make things happen while still obeying the natural laws. Lets see...what else did you oppose? Man you posted a lot of stuff. This may take a while