Research Disclosed About My Ancestry

Friday, December 5th 6:30pm Dear Diary, Well, the information that traces my family back to the slavery days has finally come out. Barack’s campaign hired genealogists to research my family’s roots, as if to confirm that he is somehow connected to the plights of millions of African Americans’ ancestors. It’s fine. I understand why he had to do it. But I almost wish I could have found out this information outside of the political arena. It’s so personal. I appreciated that they kept this information under wraps for a bit so I could process the information. It’s so sensitive that I would have been insulted if it had just been reported like regular news. But I’m glad that it is being reported, because we certainly can’t hide from our past. And, knowing how far my family has come is quite an honor. After all, my great-great grandfather was born as a slave – not a free man. He would never have imagined, in his wildest dreams that his great-great granddaughter would be the First Lady. This truly reinforces how far African-Americans have come, though I certainly don’t think the battle for equality is over. We may be legally “equal,” but until the income gap, the achievement gap, and the gap in the legal system between white and black Americans close, we must continue to fight for equality. It’s hard to imagine that I’m about to live in a home partially built by slaves, but I think that recognizing such honors their lives. And in no way can we ever forget that shameful chapter of American history. Yours always, Michelle Originally posted in The Secret Diary of Michelle Obama

New Position in the Office of the Vice President

Friday, December 5th 6:30pm Dear Diary, Can’t believe this economy. Bush has left our country (and the rest of the world) a mess, and go figure – we have to clean up after him. I do think it was wrong of him and the economists not to announce that we entered the recession last December. It wasn’t fair to the people to not inform them that they were about to hit hard times, since they could have at least planned for it. Regardless, I feel that it’s my responsibility to help do something about it. So, I’ve decided to help Barack with his Economic Recovery Plan by creating a new position within my office: Chief Economist and Economic Policy Advisor. I’ve named Jared Bernstein to fill this position for many reasons. He’s worked with a variety of domestic and international economic policies, and he’s dedicated to helping middle class families. Finally, for the first time in eight long years, we’ll have people in the White House who are committed to helping the middle class. And I’m on the forefront of the action. I realized that Barack is probably never going to make a speech addressing my duties, so I’m taking this on myself. I’m going to define my own office and exactly what I’m going to do as Vice President. And while I won’t be a Dick Cheney, I’m certainly going to shake things up and bring the change we need to turn this country around. Whew, this diary entry sounds like a campaign speech. But I’m feeling really good about having Bernstein on my team, and I think he can help Barack and myself to turn around this recession. Until next time, Joe the Veep

Originally posted in The Secret Diary of Joe Biden

SolarNail Removal

SolarNail is a patented liquid and powder that you know well as acrylic. Yup, your alternative all natural nails that you were promised are made from the same as all the others, acrylic. All nail enhancements, no matter what you are told, are acrylic based. Remember that when you walk into that discount salon, they are trying to sell a product (not to say that all discount salons are bad). The SolarNail acrylic that is used is a refined dental acrylic that is used in fillings. The good news is that means that removing them isn't going to require rocket science.
 
Nail enhancements are not always as easy to remove as they're supposed to be. The acrylic base that is made up from liquid and powder is methyl methacrylate and can be hard to break down. Your honest to God best bet to get those babies off is to go to a good nail salon that knows what they are doing. However, if you insist on doing them at home on your own, swing by the store and pick up some pure acetone.
 
Get yourself comfy cause you're going to need to soak your finger nails for about 30 minutes. When the timer dings, work on one finger at a time. If you remove all of them from the acetone, the acrylic is going to re-harden and you will get to start the process all over again.
 
After 30 minutes of soaking, your nails should not take much force to remove them. If your nails were done right, you will not need to rip or pry them off. Ripping and tearing will cause your nails major damage that can be temporary or long term. You are also putting yourself at a 100% chance at some unneeded pain.
 
So if they don't come off easily, the cheapskates that did your nails used a product called MMA. Even though it is band for use on nails by the FDA, it is still found in some nail salons. MMA is super cheap in comparison to what should actually be used and any reputable nail technician wouldn't be caught dead using it. MMA makes nail enhancements extremely hard to remove and most times the nails won't get removed.
 
If this is the situation you find yourself in, do you and your poor fingernails a huge favor and go to a good salon. Spend the extra few bucks to save yourself a lot of pain (and fingernails that will only embarrass you). A nail tech will have to help you trim them back, file them down and make them look as presentable as possible until they grow out. Before you leave the helpful nail salon that came to your rescue, be sure to tip your nail tech and grab their card. Put it in your wallet and make a promise to yourself that in the future, this will be the only place that does your nails from here on out. Don't learn the hard way like I did. After my set of nail enhancements from a cheap discount place, I hardly had a nail bed left to speak for when the enhancements came off. My fingers were red and swollen. Any pressure, even from just holding a pencil, hurt like an SOB. That was the first and last time I have ever had my nails done.

Two species we're dealing with here!

I have a friend, we'll call him Yoda, who is 70 years old and who has counseled over 5,000 families. His own family is a model, all of his grown children Yodas themselves ... let's skip to the bottom line. The man's never wrong. ;- ) When I had kids 5 or 6 years old, they were doing pretty good. I took him to lunch and asked how he thought my parenting skills, such as they were, could help me in my job. He said, they can't. I said huh, or something. He said, "Because the way you deal with little kids, is you say, DO THIS. DON'T DO THAT. "But with kids 12 years old and up, you listen to them. You trade ideas with them. You lead them kind of like you lead grownups." I thought about that... my kids are 18 and 17, and I'm still thinking about it... ................. In my humble opinion, the biggest single trap that we American parents can get into, is to treat 4-year-old children as though they were mentally competent. They are not. "Do you want the Libby's or the Del Monte Green Beans, Dear?" ::shaking head:: They want to know that we are finding the right things for them to eat. :- ) I read an account, possibly apocryphal, of an elementary school that decided to try a progressive experiment. A well-meaning staffer decided that the chain-link fence around the playground sent the wrong message. They'll think we don't trust them to do the right thing, so it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Teach them from an early age that they can be expected to set their own boundaries. Sitting and chatting in the Quad at the UW with friends, it sounds so plausible and so enlightened. Dealing with actual, living, breathing 6-year-olds, the truth's a little different. Either in this apocryphal story, or in real life, the same thing happened: when the chain-link fence was down, 98% of the students huddled very close to the building, while 2% got themselves into deep, deep trouble. It's a metaphor for the Grade Three experience. ............. Young children need security. They need to know that everything's going to be all right. Part of that is KNOWING that Mommy and Daddy are infallible. Young children don't know if it's okay to go into the neighbor's yard with the doggie, and they know that they don't know. Mommy does know. The difference between a Golden Retriever and a German Shepherd. ............... We don't have to dominate 6-year-olds in order to direct them. One thing children can tell, is WHY we are telling them no. Telling them no, because I'm irritated at them and I'm getting back at them for refusing to eat their porridge? Telling them no, because I had a long day and don't want to take the time to read the book? Telling them no, because I want to drink the soda later myself? Or telling them no, because I want the best for them, and am caring for them with sincerity? THAT, a young child can sense. And a young child who senses that, will respect you. ................. Now, the age comes when a child can think after the fashion of adults. It's about 11 for girls, about 12 for boys, in my experience. (This corresponds to the Jewish verdict in the Bar Mitzvah, for example.) Don't worry about absolutes. When you believe your child truly can reason, it's time to start reasoning. A 14-year-old appreciates being listened to. As Yoda once told us, "If you hear your 14-year-old out, and then you make a decision she hates, she will at least put it down to you being old and out of touch. But she'll figure you love her. If you refuse to hear her side of it, she'll resent you and resent you deeply." ............ My 6-year-old daughter did indeed want security. When she was 13, she wanted to know that I knew that she knew things I didn't, and that I'd do my best to be fair. Children learn what they live. It's a good thing that they cut us so much slack. Cheers, Jeff .................. Image from snapshot.parade.com

collection of 400 breyers for sale give or take a few...Im haing trouble parting w/ them :(

sadley I have to sell a good 1/2 of my collection wich I started in 1983... there are a good 800 models I have .... so I cant really tell you what I have ... if you are looking for something specific.. let me know.. if you would like to buy the whole lot ... I will go through and price them .. all are in increadible condition... though I dont have all the boxes... email me if intrested Aryn fanastasiax13x@aol.com

Capitalism at its finest

"You got kicked off PERV?!  What in the world could you have done to get you kicked off a dimension like Perv?" - Aahz, to Skeeve (Robert Asprin)

From 2001 to 2008, Cindy and I ran one of the internet's most customer-friendly e-stores.  It was a great run while it lasted  ... :- )

We sold high-end, gently-used men's suits, buying Armani suits that had been worn once or twice for $20, and selling them for $50.  We sold, I don't know, 15,000 or 20,000 of these in six years, with a satisfaction rating of 99.1%.

Our store policies were simple:  the customer is always (A-L-W-A-Y-S) right.  It had a spot in the lining that we missed?  No problem, full refund, and we'll give you your shipping back -- both ways.  LOL.  Guess what?  We'll refund you 110% plus shipping BEFORE YOU SEND IT BACK.

We were verrrryyyyyyy careful to try to send out the super-sweetest blazers and suits.  We genuinely wanted our customers to be thrilled.  We wanted to make friends.  My wife wrapped the suits in colored crepe paper and tossed candy in the USPS box.  She thought of them as presents for friends.

Doesn't fit?  Send it back.  We'll e-refund you 5 minutes after we get your letter.

Don't like the color quite like you thought you would?  Your wife doesn't care for it?  You left it on the sofa and your doggy wet on it?  Send it back.   90 days later?  Send it back.  Here's your 110%, brother.

Does Nordstrom do that for you?  :- )

..............

It was a beautiful business:  we loved our customers, and they loved us.  The one thing is, we were swamped with orders like President Obama swamped with confetti at a DNC convention.  It's just my wife and me, so the shipping times ran 7-10 days.

Our auctions said this, clearly:  we are swamped, because we're selling you a $2,000 Oxxford suit for $89, and a lot of people want them.  It'll take a week or two to get there.  It would be a lot more than that from Nordstrom.  It would be months from Oxxford.  A week or two is the ship time here.  If it runs late, we'll give you 50% of your money back and you keep the suit.

95% of buyers judged this to be a neat deal.  Others, buying a suit for the first time and used to 1-day turnarounds on CD orders, complained via e-mail.  Our response?  Hey, very sorry, here's some $$$$ back and it's in the mail tomorrow.

..............

Though we got 99% positive ratings, the downfall was that (mostly new) buyers had our shipping time rated at 4.1 out of 5.0.  The appropriate response to this, we discovered, was to prevent us from doing e-business.  Banned from selling.

We sent everybody in the company :- ) e-mails trying to reason with them.  We called at least five decision-makers.  "When you rate a restaurant 4 of 5 stars, do you mean that they FAILED?", I asked one manager.  "Do customers who give us 4 stars want us BANNED?"  He swallowed hard, paused a long time, and said, "Me, personally, I don't think so."  Ah, well.

I'm a capitalist, but when one company owns all the telephone lines, a capitalist government does turn its head over in that direction.  People's lives can get seriously messed up.

Cheers,
Jeff

* footnote:  six months later, we sorted it out.  But that's another post... :- )

Noisy Roosters

My friend lives in the burbs and has a handfull of shickens and roosters. The roosters are very noisy and he wants to know if there are any procedures to quiet the noise. (ie. vocal chord removal, training, diet, etc.)

His Dark Materials - no Switzerland in this culture war

As we noted in part two:

The grim fate of the Authority emerges in the final book. Lyra see the Authority; He is a bedridden, sick old man who knows nothing of anything (!). God dies, apparently from simply being too old and fragile to come to Earth.

Breaking from (more-)objective description to offer our own Compass on these moral premeses ...

We might say that this is where the series breaks down into self-parody. It typifies the Dershowitzian-style arrogance that can find a way to presume the creature to be far more intelligent than the Creator. Who designed this DNA stuff, anyway? If a Transcendent Being invented the Periodic Table and the EMP wavelengths, and tuned the gravitational constant to enable the Big Bang, could his IQ feasibly be lower than that a college professor?

Let’s say that Pullman’s IQ is 170. The Being who tuned the gravitational constant to one part in 10 to the 14th power has an IQ of 140? How, precisely, does an intelligent man like Phillip Pullman possibly conceive of a Transendent Being as a senile old fool?

Many of us reading this have IQ's that have to be tested with targeted metrics. How many of us -- soberly and advisedly -- have concluded that ours would exceed that of a Transendent Being's?

Also as we noted earlier:

So Pullman posits simply that God was the wrong answer; that humanity’s own passions were the only forces that ever really meant anything; and that those self-oriented passions would be the foundations for a new heaven; a right heaven.

Lewis’ foundation for a meaningful existence was the photo-negative of this: he proposed Love — rather than self-absorption — as the basis of a meaningful eternity.

A Christian can admire certain aspects of humanism, such as self-reliance, passion for self-development, and insistence on intellectual freedom. He (she) shares these ideals.

Where a Christian believes that humanism falls off the stool, is in its premise that self-absorption can provide contentment in the long term. Interested scholars might investigate King Solomon's answer to this in the Book of Ecclesiastes: "Who can eat, or hasten thereto, more than I?" Solomon that found every answer of life wore thin, over time -- except one.

Love, in the sense that Jesus Christ offered it, is the one commodity that the Christian believes can increase contentment in an open-ended, eternal context.

Humanists scoff. The reader judges.

............

The Christian is befuddled by humanists' assumption that he would love to see a hyper-fascist society such as that portrayed in The Handmaid's Tale. It never seems to occur, that for a long time "Christians" were in fact the hugely dominant majority in the United States.

Did George Washington or Abraham Lincoln cast the nation in the horrific terms suffered by Natasha Richardson's Handmaid? Do humanists imagine C.S. Lewis to be a closet bully who would laugh maniacally if he were able to strap Antony Flew onto a torture table?

It's the obligation of any serious rhetoricist to attack the actual positions of his opponent, and the strongest positions of his opponent. Consider carefully: Hollywood's, and the literary world's, relentess caricaturization of Christian ideals persuades nobody in Middle America. The game is up with Joe MainStreet before it begins, because Joe MainStreet knows his pastor. And Joe knows that his pastor has much more in common with the gentle C.S. Lewis than he does with the hyper-fascists cast as the villains in the Ultraviolets of literature.

"His Dark Materials" will affect people’s lives worldwide, driving controversy because of its intent. It perhaps is not the Formalist’s duty to declare the meaning good or evil, but it is within yours and mine. A series like The Dark Materials forms a litmus test for our moral orientation. There is no Switzerland in this culture war.

Respectfully, Jeff

Washington Wine Regions

There are hundreds of wineries in Washington state, though many of them are tiny artisanal wineries producing limited quantities of hand crafted wines. Here's a list of the major wine producing areas of the state, with a sampling of wineries from each. Keep in mind that some wineries are not open to the public, or have limited tour and tasting schedules, so check the Web site before beginning your private tour— or take a list to your local wine shop.

Seattle—In the western half of the state of Washington, Seattle is a commercial, cultural and technology hub of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle sits on Puget sound, and is surrounded by mountains and water. Although not the Washington capital, Seattle is the largest population of any city in the state. And Seattle has several wineries, many of them tiny but amazing artisan wineries. A few of the Seattle wineries: Cadence Winery, E. B. Foote winery, Fall Line Winery, Owen and Sullivan Winery, Stomani Cellars, Wilridge Winery.

Woodinville—A suburban city about 18 miles NE of Seattle, or thirty minutes by car, with a number of wineries. The larger wineries include Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Winery, Domaine Ste. Michelle, maker of sparkling wines, but there are a number of small boutique and artisanal wineries in the Woodinville/Redmond area.

Yakima Valley—Yakima, with cool weather, and volcanic soil is an agricultral paradise in Eastern Washington. In additional to numerous orchards, there are many wineries, large and small. Prosser- In the eastern half of the Yakima Valley, about three and a half hours from Seattle, Prosser is the home of a number of wineries, including some of the state's oldest. A few of the more easily found vintages include Covey Run Winery, Hogue Cellars, Kiona Vineyards and Winery, and Snoqualmie.

Colombia Gorge—An area that runs along the Columbia River and between Washington and Oregon, three or or four hours from the Seattle area depending on traffic, but quite reasonable from either Portland, Oregon, or Prosser, Washington. There are a number of wineries, large and small, as well as vineyards. Columbia Gorge (an official appellation) Washington wineries include: Columbia Crest and Klickitat Canyon.

If you want to create your own private Washington wine tours, make sure to visit the Washington Wine Commission's site, where you can generate your own tour map.

Randy Moss

My son has every jersey Moss ever played in, I think, home and road … :- ) After Moss’ 175 yards (or whatever) in the 2007 opener for the Patriots, we were listening to John Clayton on the radio. Clayton may be the best-prepared sportswriter I have ever listened to.  Love the guy.  He is what a sportswriter should be. But.  Clayton was asked about Moss’ chances to have a renaissance in New England and he’s like, “forget it. I watched that game and he is slow. They’ll adjust next week and that will be the end of it.” John (my son) and I just about fell out of our chairs. I’m thinking, either Mr. Clayton or I do not understand the game of football … seriously, that is exactly the thought I had at the time… True. Nobody is as fast at 30 as they were at 26. But that doesn’t take away what makes Jerry Rice, or Steve Largent, or Randy Moss what they are. This one was a no-brainer, and it seemed like nobody (other than the Pats) saw the coal pile in the ballroom. Sixteen games and 23 touchdowns later, Moss and the Patriots had emerged from the pile of crumpled paper cups rather cleanly, we think...

source: Planetfun

Check the year-by-year receiving TD leaders. Moss had (roughly) enough touchdowns in 2007 to LEAD! ... L-E-A-D the NFL for BOTH 2005 and 2006. Moss didn't just put up two seasons' worth of performance in one year. Moss put up two (2) GREAT seasons' worth of touchdowns -- in one season. Combine Steve Smith's sensational scoring in 2005, with Terrell Owens' superstar performance in 2006? And Randy Moss did both of those things in one year. …………………. Moss isn’t a freak of nature; he is Steve Largent with more athleticism. It is Moss’ concentration and his field vision that make him who he is. His essential attributes are suburban Larry Bird, not inner-city Shawn Kemp. Moss knows where the defenders are, when other WR’s do not, and that is precisely what allows him to go around or over them for the ball. He is not just grabbing for the ball hoping to get lucky; he is picking the ball clean like an NBA guard who flashes his hand to the inside of an opponent’s hand for a steal. Moss hangs on to the leather with one hand when he is being rocked, why? … because he chooses to pay attention to the leather, and he chooses not to pay attention to whether he will get poked in the eye or not. Moss throws no-look laterals because he is aware of where teammates are, earlier than other players do. The incredible leaping ability camoflages Moss’ real talents, which are talents of the mind. We shouldn’t pigeonhole black players as being athletes first when it is just as possible that their work ethic, toughness, and will to win are the keys. It is true that Moss was physically blessed with huge, strong hands. It's also true that Michael Jordan was blessed with very long lower legs. For a long time in the 80’s, people thought Michael Jordan’s essential attribute was his body. It was not. Jordan's essential attribute was a determination to impose his will. That is precisely what you are seeing when Randy Moss wrestles the ball away from two defenders. It's the NFL version of MJ thundering around the corner to dunk over a center. ……………. Personally don’t prep for NFL roto drafts (much) any more, but there is a field-level view that is much MORE important in football than it is in baseball. Now we can understand why Salisbury gets so frustrated with Clayton sometimes. Clayton is a work fanatic though. Gotta love the guy. Glad he’s in the HOF. …………… Rice, Largent, and others were stars well into their 30's. I expect Randy Moss to be a great receiver for the next six years, at least. The Patriots may become the NFL's greatest modern dynasty. ………………… Chuck Knox once said, "when one of theirs beats two of yours, there isn't a thing you can do about it, from a coaching standpoint." :- ) So imagine yourself preparing for Moss and Brady. It's just about as hopeless a situation as you could face from an X's and O's standpoint. ……………. You wonder why GM's in all sports gamble on players with injury and character issues? It's because you can wind up with a Randy Moss by taking a player nobody else would. One hit like that makes up for an awful lot of swings and misses :- ) 2007 was a whale of a fun year to watch sports in Boston. Sometimes a dice roll comes up box cars. Cheers, jemanji

Pages