city folks

Just had some city folks moved in next door. Nice pair but a little strange. They built a chicken coupe over a pond where the have catfish. They say they will recycle the chicken dropings for fish food. The water stinks a mighty something. Where do they get theses ideas?

A Cheap Shot

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 8:30pm Dear Diary, Barack and I are not friends. I can’t believe how he humiliated me in front of those kids. As if he really has to impress them. Come on! A bunch of fourth graders won’t be voting for another eight years or so. Why on earthy does he think has to impress them? The kids were just talking about what they’re learning in school. One kid raised his hand to announce, “Decimals.” So Barack has to blurt, “Decimals! Wow, Joe doesn’t even know his decimals.” What a cheap shot.  I would never come back with some bit talking about Barack’s fractions, or something like that. Honestly, it’s ridiculous. And it’s not like I need a bad rep when it comes to my capabilities in the White House. If anything, I need to be proving that I’m capable, since my responsibilities as a Vice-President have been few and far between, at best. Of course, I can’t complain, or say anything about this. They’ve even hired a Director of Communications for me,  since apparently I can’t be trusted to say anything on my own. these BIden gaffes are ridiculous, and definitely taken way out of context. Not to mention it’s a slap in the face to have the same guy who said that I “shoot from the hip” and “say the wrong thing at the wrong time.” Jay Carney may be a smart guy. And I’ll admit, I think it’s clever that they put in the same guy who once insulted my public speaking abilities. I’d rather just be my own Director of Communications, though I suppose that’s not an option. Until next time, Joe the Veep

Shipment Status with buymeds.com

I have a question. If it says "payment processed, pending shipment" under my order status, does this mean my script has been approved and how long can I expect to wait now to receive my meds??? I've left 2 messages with them and haven't heard back. I placed my order on Friday 3/28. I'm becoming weary.

Apology for Ann? Not Necessary

Tuesday, December 16th 10:10pm Dear Diary, Ann Coulter never ceases to amaze me. And after being informed that she addressed me directly on the Hannity and Colmes show, I couldn’t help but watch the clip on YouTube, just to see what inanities she cared to express. As expected, it was ridiculous. Barack has decided (with my encouragement) to be sworn in as Barack Hussein Obama, since it is a tradition for the president to be sworn in using one’s entire name. To be sworn in as simply Barack Obama would be calling into question how comfortable Barack is with his own name, which then brings up a host of other issues and implications. He and I both agree that it’s better go about this according to protocol. But of course, all the conservative news stations and television shows are having a field day with this. Ann Coulter, one of Sean Hannity’s favorite guests, (guest being a more realistic title than “pundit,” which gives more credit than is due) has to make this a big deal. At first she called him “B. Hussein Obama,” but then resorted to simple referring to him as “Hussein.” When she identified him as “B. Hussein,” I had to stand up. It’s obvious she’s trying to create a fear bomb by creating a non-existent connection between him and Saddam Hussein to scare Americans. Not only that, since when is a President referred to by his middle name? I never heard of FDR referred to as “F. Delano” or Richard Nixon called “R. Milhous,” or simply “Milhous.” So why do it with Barack? She’s trying to create fear. And to demand an apology from me for telling the truth is laughable. I’m simply calling a spade a spade. So no, Ann Coulter, I will not apologize. More importantly, it’s sad that Barack’s middle name is even an issue. People should have more common sense than to make a big deal about something so insignificant and so inconsequential. Come on, America, we’re smarter than that. Yours always, Michelle

Jobs

I read on a site that there was a shortage of medical transcribers so I thought it would be a fast and good place to make some money. It sounds like you could need this information just like me so I will tell you where to go to take medical transcription classes. If you change your mind from this, you could always take different courses online at this good site. www.homeworkers.org/index.html.

Wednesday Hebrew: The Philosophy of Bet

Shalom, friends. It's Wednesday at Judeo Talk and that means it's time for our weekly Hebrew lesson. Every week we will be discussing a different Hebrew letter, word or phrase and its importance to Jewish faith and culture. This being our first installment of Wednesday Hebrew, we're already on the subject of beginnings. So, I thought I'd take the opportunity to give a quick lesson about one of the most famous phrases in the Torah. The word Bereishit (Beh-ray-sheet), which means "In the beginning". This is the first word in the Hebrew bible, known colloquially as The Old Testament. Hebrew is a very deep, complex language that is often used in the Torah in such a way that single words, even individual letters have multiple layers of meaning. The fact that Bereishit is the first word in the Torah, and more precisely that the letter Bet is the first letter in the Torah, is itself a lesson and an object of focus for the rest of the Hebrew bible. The Hebrew letter Bet makes the same sound as the English letter B. In the word "Bereishit" the Bet acts as the common suffix "Bih" meaning "In". The word "Reishit" meaning "Beginning" comes from the term "Rishon" which means "First". In fact, the word "Rishon" plays an important part in the Book of Genesis. "Rishon" is visually and phonetically very distinct from the more common root for the number 1, which is "Echad". Linguistic focus points like this appear throughout the Torah and are meant to give us pause and to indicate something special. Using the term "Rishon" and its derivatives makes this portion of the Torah focus on beginnings, on firsts and most importantly on uniqueness. There is also a Midrash associated with Bet and the importance of its placement at the very beginning of the Torah. Young Jews are asked to imagine themselves as the dot in the middle of Bet. Notice how the only clear path is directly forward (Hebrew is read from right to left). If the Torah begins with Bet and we live our lives by the Torah, then we must remember to keep our minds on the present and on the potential of the future. We must not dwell on the past, which is irretrievably behind us. We must not gaze at our feet in inaction or preoccupy ourselves with the grave above which we walk. And however pious we may be we must not look upward to Heaven, either for guidance or in aspirations toward paradise, while there is so much for us to do here in life. So, from the very beginning (literally), the Torah establishes itself as document concerned with life. As we continue with our lessons, we will see this sentiment reiterated time and again. This is the true depth and power of Torah study. In every letter there is a lesson. The stories themselves are important, but how they are told can have just as much, or sometimes more, meaning.

Apology for Ann? Not Necessary

Tuesday, December 16th 10:10pm Dear Diary, Ann Coulter never ceases to amaze me. And after being informed that she addressed me directly on the Hannity and Colmes show, I couldn’t help but watch the clip on YouTube, just to see what inanities she cared to express. As expected, it was ridiculous. Barack has decided (with my encouragement) to be sworn in as Barack Hussein Obama, since it is a tradition for the president to be sworn in using one’s entire name. To be sworn in as simply Barack Obama would be calling into question how comfortable Barack is with his own name, which then brings up a host of other issues and implications. He and I both agree that it’s better go about this according to protocol. But of course, all the conservative news stations and television shows are having a field day with this. Ann Coulter, one of Sean Hannity’s favorite guests, (guest being a more realistic title than “pundit,” which gives more credit than is due) has to make this a big deal. At first she called him “B. Hussein Obama,” but then resorted to simple referring to him as “Hussein.” When she identified him as “B. Hussein,” I had to stand up. It’s obvious she’s trying to create a fear bomb by creating a non-existent connection between him and Saddam Hussein to scare Americans. Not only that, since when is a President referred to by his middle name? I never heard of FDR referred to as “F. Delano” or Richard Nixon called “R. Milhous,” or simply “Milhous.” So why do it with Barack? She’s trying to create fear. And to demand an apology from me for telling the truth is laughable. I’m simply calling a spade a spade. So no, Ann Coulter, I will not apologize. More importantly, it’s sad that Barack’s middle name is even an issue. People should have more common sense than to make a big deal about something so insignificant and so inconsequential. Come on, America, we’re smarter than that. Yours always, Michelle Originally posted in The Secret Diary of Michelle Obama

My German Shepard & Her Sparrow Best Friend

I proudly owned a full German line Shepard named Susie for twelve magnificent years until cancer claimed her happy life. But what she gave to me and how much joy that she brought me, I will never forget. She was an unusual dog, extremely intelligent and a problem solver, to say the least. But she had this odd fascination with birds. She loved to chase them and hunt them, as many canines do, and she would catch them all of the time. Many times too late for me to save the poor little things from her massive and powerful jaws—which led me to dub her ‘Bird Killer’ at the tender age of two. I was training her for showmanship and hunting as well as protection at the time, and scent tracking, so I was proud that she exhibited such prowess, while it saddened me at the same time that it was at the expense of the poor birdies. Dogs Don’t Tend to Make Friends with Pesky Birds This is where the story takes a really weird turn. One day I am getting back home from running errands around town and I look in the back yard to check on my dog and see her playing with a bird. Not hurting it. Not chasing it, but playing with it, like two dogs would play with each other. The bird would nose dive her and squawk, and she would run around tromping like a pony. She would even let the bird land on her back and perch; they were truly, somehow, the best of friends. Needless to say, I was quite perplexed by this. They Would Play in the Afternoons This playful banter continued for months, and nearly every time that I would return home I would see her playing with her bird friend. We shortly thereafter named the bird Woodstock, because of the popular Peanuts character, Snoopy’s best bird friend. This trend continued forever, it seemed. Eventually Woodstock had baby birds with another bird, and after a few months she would even let them play with Susie? That one blew my mind, a mother bird allowing a full grown dog to play with her young? Totally void of the laws of nature, or so it seemed. My German Shepard Hated all Other Birds These were the only birds that my dog would not harm, she loved them. But if she saw any other birds while playing with them, the chase was on. Susie continued to hunt other birds and bring me presents, but never touched Woodstock or her babies. I will never know to this day why or how. Eventually the day came where we moved, mind you only about a few miles east down the street, literally. We did not see Woodstock for quite some time after that. But then one day I heard the familiar squawking coming from the backyard, and there was Woodstock, dive bombing Susie again. Once again these two friends found a way to connect and were playing as happy as could be. Woodstock remained for a few more years, until cancer eventually claimed Susie’s life. Perhaps it is one of the fondest memories that I have of my beautiful German Shepard.

Rumor Mill

Caveat emptor: We ain't gonna prove 'em, link 'em, or Google 'em for ya. :- ) Take it or leave it. Youse guys have known me since (as far back as) 1995 and you have a feel for how careful I am, or amn't, with info processing. ............... COEFFICIENT OF CONFIDENCE = 0.85: Bidding on Teixeira is already up to $22.5M x 8 years and will go considerably higher. AL teams who are north of $20M already (!) include LA, Boston AND New York. D-O-V and all iterations thereof are scoff-free zones. If you're one of those who thinks that LA, Boston and New York are idiots and you're the guy who's smart, please head three websites up I-5 and stay there. ;- ) I'm going to assume at this point -- the jelling of the expectations in the $24-27M range -- that it's a moot point for the Mariners. .............. COEFFICIENT OF CONFIDENCE = 0.65: Inquiry on Adam Dunn is coming from the Angels, Dodgers, Nationals, and ... Mariners! (Obviously the Angels are pushing hard for Tex and setting up Dunn as the safety net.) I realize, just from my re-baptism here this week, that there is a blog or two that (predictably) loathes the idea of Dunn. Well, good to know that little has changed. :- ) :winning smile: The object of the game is still to keep the powder dry. If you agree with the anti-Dunn argument, you don't need me to repeat it for you at length. (Psst: it's "Sexson redux.") We'll deal with that if the rumors get hot. For now, notice that Dunn is:
(a) turning 29 next season, (b) the owner of five consecutive 40-homer seasons, (c) a 130-140 OPS+ hitter, and (d) lefthanded in Safeco.
This presumably makes him a legit Zduriencik target. Youse guys told me that Zduriencik is focused, right?! ::crickets:: I don't know if we're going to have to spend the next five years playing badminton against the idea that every FA is Richie Sexson, but simply note that (a) if Dunn has precisely Sexson's weird decline, he'll have three great years from here, and (b) Safeco doesn't demoralize LH hitters. If Jeff Clement ever produced exactly Adam Dunn's lines from the last five years, we'd all be thrilled. ................... COEFFICIENT OF CONFIDENCE = 0.40: Rocco Baldelli has supposedly received word that his possibly terminal disease (a mitochondrial disorder) was misdiagnosed; now the diagnosis is channelopathy, a very treatable disease. At 24, Baldelli hit .300/.340/.530 in CF and looked headed for a possible Dale Murphy career. Baldelli was actually, what Adam Jones and Greg Halman dream of becoming. If all of a sudden he's healthier than Brandon Morrow, it's worth keeping an eye out. Imagine having a CF playing LF next to F-Gut and Ichiro. ....................... COEFFICIENT OF CONFIDENCE = 0.70: That M's fans will spend the winter hoping for that one MOTO bat that will make the 2009 M's truly interesting ... and then find out, after the M's sniff around for hometown discounts and don't get them, that the M's are "way over budget already" and are going with Bryan Lahair. COEFFICIENT OF CONFIDENCE = 0.20: That M's fans will watch Dr. D disappear like Bobby Fischer, reappear just as suddenly to post 10 times a day, and nothing weird will come of it. Cheers, Dr D .................... image: http://cdn.faniq.com/images/blog/p1_dunn-SI-mangin.jpg

Winter Deer Feeding

I live in an area of Washington that is surrounded by protected natural land. Deer are frequent visitors, particularly the Columbian black-tailed deer. We see them enough that we recognize small family groups of a mom and her two children, born last year, a young two year-old male with spikes, and a majestic buck.

It snowed Saturday night, quite a lot, for the region, and the ground accumulated about four inches. Most of the snow is still on the ground and on the trees, covering the forage the deer might otherwise eat. And it's been bitterly, atypically cold since Saturday, with day temperatures as low as 17 F.

I've seen the deer's tracks, but not the deer, and I've been a little worried about whether or not they were getting enough to eat. I know that in New Hampshire, and Vermont, and lots of other states, the Fish and Wildlife or Game departments urge that people not feed the deer. There are a number of reasons for not feeding wild deer:

  • The deer become accustomed to humans, and very quickly become pests, relying on humans for all their food
  • Once they are accustomed to humans, deer are much bolder about invading (and nibbling to death) yard plants and gardens.
  • Often humans feed deer food that deer really can't digest, or that doesn't supply proper nutrients.
  • Deer are more likely to congregate around food, and thus may quickly spread debilitating diseases throughout the local population, particularly Chronic Wasting Disease.

I was surprised to discover that Washington's department of Fish and Wildlife isn't nearly as adamant about feeding deer. They point out the problems, including the expense of providing proper feed in quantity, and for long enough to help deer survive, the fact that establishing feeding stations encourages deer to congregate, thus increasing exposure to disease, and predators, and, given where non-professionals feed deer, an increase in deer-related traffic problems. Most notably, they mention that deer' take time to become accustomed to pellet feed, and it may take several weeks for their digestive systems to adapt, and if they lack fat reserves to draw on while they adapt, deer can die of starvation with a full belly of food that they can not digest.

Yet the Washington Fish and Wildlife handout concludes:

If—after considering all these issues--an individual chooses to feed, the best artificial deer feed is a pelleted ration that contains approximately 50 percent alfalfa and 50 percent grains. Barley and corn are the recommended grains. Some feed stores carry deer pellets, but a ration prepared for horses is also suitable if it is a "complete" formula. . . . Once artificial feeding is begun, it should be continued through March or April until natural forage plants are available.

I think the reason for the different approach to wild deer feeding in Washington is based on the presence of cold snaps like the atypical one we're having now. I note the handout says that WDFW will occasionally feed the deer and elk themselves, especially when local conditions draw deer into cropland or orchards where they don't usually appear, when "Circumstances such as long-range weather forecasts, severity of snow and temperatures, the animals' condition" suggest emergency feeding might be appropriate.

I'm not going to start feeding the local deer yet, but it is worth keeping in mind if this cold snap persists. Right now, the snow shows no sign of thawing, but that could change in a day or two.

Pages