Nuclear Treaties - 6 - Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

               The NATO forces in Western Europe had enjoyed clear military dominance over the Soviet Union up to the late 1970s. The U.S. and other NATO forces bombers and missiles were clearly superior to the old Soviet missiles and bombers. The Soviets moved to balance the NATO arsenal by development and deployment of a new more power generation of mid-range nuclear missiles called SS-20 and Tu22M.

               NATO countered with deployment of new nuclear cruise missiles and Pershing ballistic missiles. They also sought negotiations with the Soviet over the build-up of nuclear weapons in Europe. These discussions had begun in Geneva, Switzerland in 1980.

During the first half of the 1980s, there was a chilling of the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union with U.S. President Reagan repeatedly accusing the Soviets of violating the provisions of the SALT II Treaty which had been signed by both sides but never ratified in the U.S. Congress. In 1981, the U.S. had suggested the complete elimination of all intermediate range nuclear weapons on both sides. There was a disagreement over the inclusion or exclusion of British and French nuclear weapons and the Soviets withdrew from the negotiations in 1983. In 1984, the U.S. began deployment of intermediate nuclear weapons in Europe despite public protests.

Negotiations began again in 1986 with a Soviet proposal to eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world, including those in Europe by 2000. The U.S. declined this offer and instead counter-offered a staged reduction of intermediate range nuclear weapons to zero by 1989. The British and French arsenals were not part of the discussions. Discussions continued in Reykjavik, Iceland between U.S. President Reagan and Soviet Premier Gorbachev over nuclear disarmament. The final text of the treaty that was hammered out was influenced by the decision of the West German Chancellor to remove U.S. nuclear weapons from Germany.

            The Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles was signed in Washington, D.C. in December of 1987. The Treaty set a deadline of 1991 and by that time, thousands of intermediate range nuclear weapons had been removed and destroyed from the European theater. Both sides were able to inspect the military installations of the other side.

             The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991 and the Russian Federation inherited their nuclear arsenal. The Russian Federation abided by the Treaty that the Soviets had signed until 2007. In that year, The RF President Putin stated that he had decided that it was no longer in the interest of the RF to adhere to the INF Treaty. The Russians were concerned about U.S. plans to deploy missiles in Poland and the Czech Republic that would be aimed at Russia. They said that their decision to continue with the INF or to withdraw from it would be strongly influenced by the U.S: deployment of the planned missiles in Eastern Europe.  Ultimately the U.S. dropped the plans for Polish and Czech missile deployment.

Signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty from a U.S. Stated Department:

Fresh spring fashion

Fashion trends in 2013: Sheer, leather and beads

A new year has finally arrived, as have fresh fashion trends. Spring is just around the corner; get in the know-it with these hot styles. From Bermuda shorts to sheer fabric to leather pants and kitten heels, this season's styles are versatile and fun. Seattle In Style offers a few trend ideas to ponder.

Bermuda Shorts

Carven | $258

Black & White

Van Mildert | $215

Sheer Somethin' Somethin'

Mango | $35

Leather Essentials

Vero Moda | $250

Kitten Heels

Cain | $288

Bold Shades

J.Crew | $495

Beautiful Beading

John Lewis | $406

2013: The year of triskaidekaphobia

Do you believe in unlucky 13, or lucky 13?

If you have a superstitious dread of the number 13 (a condition technically known as "triskaidekaphobia") then this will be a bad year for you. Unlike the floors in multi-story buildings, we can't just skip 2013 and call it 2014 instead. But you can count your luck that there isn't a thirteenth month, otherwise you would have to suffer through 13/13/13!

There are a lot of reasons given for why Western cultures consider the number 13 to be unlucky. But you can find these patterns throughout history if you care to look for them. You could just as easily amass a damning collection of facts about the number 11 or 8. And most other cultures have their own unlucky numbers. (In Asian countries, 4 is the equivalent of 13 as a number to be feared and many multi-storied buildings lack a 4th floor.)
 
Perhaps the most substantial connection between 13 and bad luck is that there were 13 people seated at the Last Supper. This is why dinner party hosts are urged to never have 13 people at the same table. Judas was the last person to be seated, the 13th guest, and look how that turned out.
 
Why is Friday the 13th particularly bad news? (I mean, aside from being the title of a long-running horror movie franchise of varying quality.) One theory holds that Fridays were considered bad luck because in medieval Europe, that's when the hangmen plied their trade. Add that to the unlucky number 13 and you have an all-purpose bad luck day, for no real reason.
 
(By the way, there is only one Friday the 13th in 2013. It falls in September.)
 
Of course, 13 is also considered a lucky number. In fact, in a highly unscientific survey which I just conducted at Googlefight.com, "lucky 13" beats out "unlucky 13" by a wide margin. You could argue that this is because Lucky 13 is the name of a popular clothing manufacturer. But I say it's all just a matter of cause and effect. The clothing manufacturer obviously took its name from the idea of 13 being lucky, not the other way around.
 
According to speculation on Wikipedia, 13's powerful reputation may be due to many cultures following a lunar calendar in which a year has 12 normal months and then one smaller "often portentous" thirteenth month. It's as good an explanation as any.
 

Colorado sees first private marijuana clubs

Club 64 a huge success

The new year is bringing innovation everywhere, even to Colorado's pot scene. In the wake of Amendment 64 in Colorado, an enterprising businessman has started a roving monthly club for smoking pot. Colorado's rules say that you cannot sell pot, nor can you smoke it in public. And Colorado's anti-smoking laws may prevent you from smoking indoors in a public establishment.

One way to work around those rules is to charge admission for a night of entertainment at a private club. For $29.95 you can get entry at Club 64 (named after the ballot amendment that legalized marijuana in Colorado). They provide free soda and snacks, and entertainment as the venue permits. It's BYOP (Bring Your Own Pot), but many people are finding it an excellent way to smoke without angering their landlords. 
 
The club's first meeting was a rousing success. The organizers limited entry to 200 people, and maxed out the venue. (At $30 a head, that's a pretty good take!) The first meeting began at 4:20 p.m. in an industrial space north of Denver, and featured disco lights and reggae music. 
 
Each meeting will take place at a different location. (The second meeting happened at a hemp clothing store in downtown Denver.) Called "private pot dens," this is one of the earliest successful methods for accommodating the ballot initiatives, as this small sports bar in Olympia, Washington has also found. Like a wacky new egalitarian take on the classic "gentlemen's clubs" of upper class England, these marijuana clubs have found an excellent way to earn a living while obeying the law.
 
One problem these clubs face is that many commercial property landlords are skittish about the prospect. One club has already been shut down in Del Norte, Colorado because the landlord objected. Aside from the reputation and the smell, landlords may be worrying about other associated illegal activities. Too many people still believe in the "Reefer Madness" old wive's tales. 
 
Luckily it looks like the truth will out. These marijuana smoking clubs have been a joyful occasion all around, with lots of happy people toking up and eating snacks. Pretty great! And in this difficult real estate climate, I expect a lot of commercial property owners will realize that it's better to lease property to pot smokers than to let it continue to sit empty and idle on a market already glutted with empty storefronts.

 

Telecommuting "debunked"

But how much work are they doing back in the office?

Surprise! Telecommuting doesn't work. Or maybe it works too well, and telecommuters end up putting in far more hours than their office-bound coworkers. Or maybe both. It kind of depends on who you talk to. One thing is for certain: The shining future where we all happily telecommute to work from the comfort of our homes is far from a reality.

I freelance from home full-time now, but for several years at my last "real job" I telecommuted two days a week. I can vouch for the fact that all of the studies Slate cites are true, but in different ways.
 
The first problem with studying how well telecommuting works is that few jobs - if you really dig into the cold hard facts - have a baseline for productivity. Most employers don't know, and probably don't WANT to know, how little their employees are actually doing on a daily basis. It is shocking how little work gets done in an office. You realize this if you work from home on a piecework basis. 
 
Let's say I had a task that I knew would take me about four hours to complete when I was in the office. Inevitably if I took it home, it would only take me half that time. Sometimes less. Why? Because I was actually working on it, while my coworkers were updating their Facebook status, harvesting their crops in Farmville, standing outside smoking, flirting in the hallways, leaning on each other's cubicle walls discussing last night's sports game - basically doing anything but actual work.
 
Oh and let's include "attending meetings" on that list. Once you start working for yourself, you realize how much time is wasted in meetings. 
 
It's a staggering amount of time-wastage, frankly. And it's unfair to hold telecommuters up to some arbitrary threshold of productivity.
 
The other factor is that telecommuters know that they are on a short leash. You feel pressured to produce more, in order to justify working from home in your sweatpants. Working from home is the carrot; the threat of being pulled permanently back into the office is the stick. 
 
Combine that with the knowledge that instead of doing work, your coworkers are interacting with each other and thus building the social relationships that will help them get ahead. And what you have is a recipe for telecommuters working themselves to the bone, just to prove that they deserve to work from home. 
 
It's a broken system, and I hope we can find better ways to fix it than having the boss spy on every telecommuter's computer.

Grace Krilanovich, The Orange Eats Creeps

Difficult but fascinating.

This was a somewhat difficult book to read, for many reasons. But it was certainly an interesting book, as well. I have pretty high standards for books that keep my attention, and I read all the way through to the end on this one. That alone gives it a passing grade.

I was excited when I learned that The Orange Eats Creeps is set in the Pacific Northwest in the 90s, among street kids and runaways and junkies in Portland and Seattle and all points in between. Having lived through that era, it's a scene that has so much richness and untapped potential that has yet to be mined in the literary field. The idea of setting a story about a runaway teenage vampire in that time and place seemed most excellent.
 
Long story short, I was expecting Drugstore Cowboys, but I got Naked Lunch.
 
The book's biggest problem, as well as its most obvious attraction, is its hallucinogenic narrative which most reviewers dub "experimental." It is told in the first person, so the question isn't whether or not the narrator is unreliable. The question is exactly HOW unreliable she is. Does she really see a forest path lined with small brown birds vomiting up little blobs of goo? Is she really psychic, or is she just experiencing guilt-related hallucinations?
 
Once you start trying to tease out the truth, the whole thing unravels. There are very few things in the book that I would consider to be "facts." Maybe she isn't even a vampire after all. Maybe it's just a hallucination, or a metaphor, or ????? Is it just one long continuous drug trip? Or is this what life is like when you are a vampire?
 
At the very very VERY least, The Orange Eats Creeps gets major props for innovation. You have never read a vampire book like this before. You have never read a book that does to the traditional vampire story narrative what this book does. You have never read a vampire book with this particular perspective. And you probably never will.
 
The field of vampire literature is much of a sameness. For that reason alone, The Orange Eats Creeps truly stands apart from the rest.
 
Audiobook note: The narrator did what she could with this text, but it was a struggle not to slip into a monotone. A problem inherent to any narrative written in the first person perspective.

Sims 3 Seasons: Holidays and parties

Gifts, silly costumes and more

One of the more delightful and also slippery aspects of Seasons is the special holidays. Not every season has a party, and not every holiday has a party. Some parties you would want to hold in some seasons but not others. Given that each season only lasts seven days (at the default settings) it can be a tricky bit of timing to get everything lined up just right. But that's the fun part of the challenge!

The Holidays
 
Each season has a holiday. For two of these holidays (Leisure Day and Snowflake Day) your adult Sims with jobs will get the day off work, and your child and teen Sims will get the day off work. The day off will be indicated on the Employment tab by being circled in red.
 
Spring: Love Day (similar to Valentine's Day). Romantic interactions will do better, and your Sim will be more likely to get love notes.
 
Summer: Leisure Day (similar to Independence Day). I haven't found anything special about this day compared to the rest of summer.
 
Fall: Spooky Day (similar to Halloween). Your child and teen Sims can go trick-or-treating at the houses in your town. 
 
Winter: Snowflake Day (similar to Christmas). 
 
The Parties
 
Costume Party: This one is obviously meant for Halloween. If you hold a Costume Party, everyone that you invite will switch into their costumes at the door. It's pretty fun to see what everyone dresses as. Although in my experience, at least 1/3rd of them will dress up in a hot dog costume. (So far my record is five hot dogs at a single party.)
 
Gift-Giving Party: Meant for Christmas, at this party everyone exchanges gifts. Your Sims can end up with some sweet random objects, or get something dumb. 
 
Feast Party: A Thanksgiving-style feast. When I held one, every guest Sim brought a dish, potluck-style. (This could have just been a fluke, though. I have noticed that as of Seasons, Sims invited to parties are much more likely to bring dishes, the way they did in Sims 2.)
 
Pool Party: Ideally you would want to hold this one in summer, although my Sims were once invited to a pool party in the dead of winter. (Brr!)
 
Being something of a literal-minded person, I personally would want to hold the appropriate parties on the appropriate days. However, there's nothing to stop you from holding a party on any day you wish. And as you can see, there are no parties associated with spring, and two parties associated with fall. Bummer!

Video Non Sequitur: Fireworks In Reverse

Fireworks videos are going to be everywhere for the next few days/weeks, so why not start out the new year with something different? Here we have the Melbourne fireworks display, shown artistically in reverse. Enjoy!

Pop Culture Happenings: Training Montage Montage

Well, the holidays are officially over. Your family is hopefully gone and back home, you are 10 lbs overweight since Thanksgiving, and you have a variety of resolutions kicking around in your head, as you do every year. For you, I say, take this nice montage (read: supercut) of training montages and get your ass back in shape. You're the best... around!

Pages